Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
-
mdemircan2
- Level 4 user
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
-
maff
- Level 3 user
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:59 pm
- Location: BR https://t.me/captalismlab
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
There should be an option NO, I don't think there should be, as this encourages hiring a CMO and leaving him responsible for advertising, micromanagement after a while is really annoying, hiring a CMO for these cases would make us more comfortable decide on larger planning plans for the company.
-
Yimmy
- Level 3 user
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 1:27 pm
Re: Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
Maff wrote:
" ... I don't think there should be, as this encourages hiring a CMO and leaving him responsible for advertising, micromanagement after a while is really annoying, hiring a CMO for these cases would make us more comfortable decide on larger planning plans for the company."
Could you clarify your comment? I read it to mean that you believe the CMO is an existing option that should be used by all players regardless of their game play strategy and playing style. I also read it to mean that you think the CMO is beneficial because it enables the player to focus on other big-picture plans. It is entirely valid for you to support and defend the CMO option for your style of play. I believe it is much less valid for you to believe that the CMO is the best option for my, and or other players', chosen style of play.
I personally do not need a flawed CMO to show me how to "decide on larger planning plans" for my company. The reason I made the batch-switching suggestion is because the CMO consistently makes changes that detract and interfere with my larger game plans for my company.
" ... I don't think there should be, as this encourages hiring a CMO and leaving him responsible for advertising, micromanagement after a while is really annoying, hiring a CMO for these cases would make us more comfortable decide on larger planning plans for the company."
Could you clarify your comment? I read it to mean that you believe the CMO is an existing option that should be used by all players regardless of their game play strategy and playing style. I also read it to mean that you think the CMO is beneficial because it enables the player to focus on other big-picture plans. It is entirely valid for you to support and defend the CMO option for your style of play. I believe it is much less valid for you to believe that the CMO is the best option for my, and or other players', chosen style of play.
I personally do not need a flawed CMO to show me how to "decide on larger planning plans" for my company. The reason I made the batch-switching suggestion is because the CMO consistently makes changes that detract and interfere with my larger game plans for my company.
-
maff
- Level 3 user
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:59 pm
- Location: BR https://t.me/captalismlab
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
I understand what you mean, sometimes the CMO changes some research even
Re: Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
I'm for improving the CMO. even if you batch switch your retail to use your recently adquired media company, setting the investment amount, and balancing the investing to acheive 100 pts is tedious. So I end up needing the CMO anyways. CMO should handle media firms but instead I have to use the COO who may not be skilled for media/advertising.
I have used Media subsidiaries with some success but they end up cratering at some point. Media is just hard for me so I want to pay the AI
I have used Media subsidiaries with some success but they end up cratering at some point. Media is just hard for me so I want to pay the AI